Electrical capacity is a placeholder at all twelve sites. Nobody has confirmed that the electrical service at any site could support chargers - every row of the canonical contract reads capacity_basis = placeholder, and all 12 sites score Low data confidence - none reaches even Medium. The rankings below compare sites on modelled demand and screening-class cost; they are not a statement that any site is electrically feasible. No feasibility claim is permitted on placeholder capacity, and none is made here.

Planning-Screen Results

Key Findings from the Readiness Model

The canonical milestone2_v3 model identifies which candidate sites appear strongest, which sites need more review, and which locations should be monitored before public charging investment moves forward.

These rankings come from the canonical milestone2_v3 model. An earlier published version of this page showed legacy_v2 scores, under which FFX002 led at 58.8. The canonical model uses fixed anchors rather than scoring sites against each other, and ranks FFX004 (Fairfax County Government Center) first at 53.4, with FFX002 second at 51.8. This page has been corrected; the change is recorded rather than made silently. Neither ordering is a feasibility finding - electrical capacity is an unverified placeholder at all twelve sites.

Top Model Signals

An auto-rotating 3D gallery of planning signals from the canonical milestone2_v3 model.

01/06

Top overall candidate

FFX004 · Fairfax County Government Center

AUTO · DRAG · SCROLL · ← → · CLICK TO OPEN

Card images. FFX004: Photo: Antony-22, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons; cropped and darkened · FFX002, PWC002, PWC003, PWC006, PWC008: Aerial view, USGS The National Map: NAIP Plus orthoimagery (public domain).

What planners should take from this

FFX002 and FFX004 are the strongest current Tier 1 planning signals.
PWC006 is the strongest Prince William County library candidate.
PWC002 remains useful, but its high-review status means implementation questions should be resolved early.
PWC008 and PWC005 should be monitored rather than treated as immediate high-priority expansion sites.
PWC003 should not advance as a general-public charging buildout without a changed public-access or fleet-use case.

Planning-support results, not final approvals

These results support early screening, prioritization, and discussion. They do not replace final engineering design, utility coordination, permitting, procurement, ADA review, fire/AHJ review, stormwater review, construction approval, or stakeholder confirmation.

Next Steps

Continue evaluating candidate sites with deeper methodologies and dashboard tooling.

Explore full dashboard → Read the methodology →

Tableau Evidence

Exported model visuals supporting the readiness scores and action decisions.

Open in Tableau ↗

Results Explorer

A planning report is embedded below from an external host; this repository cannot verify what that host serves. The copy tracked here was generated 2026-06-28 from the legacy_v2 baseline - its table is headed “Current Site Ranking” but its scores are superseded by the gallery above, and it names no model mode. Treat it as a dated artifact, not as current model output.

Public EV Charging Planning Report Model-generated planning-support artifact

If the embedded viewer does not load, open the PDF directly ↗